How To Be a Better Teacher, or, I Suck
I thought I was getting comfortable. Competent. If not great, at least better than last year. Slipping a little more gracefully into my role as Benevolent Dictator of the ELA fiefdom in Room 200. My school is a training ground for overlords: I don't like how Striver High does authority, discipline, pedagogy, collaboration, or community, but it's a million times better than many city schools. Even if teachers here rely on worksheets, textbooks, and threats more than I would like, it is a relatively peaceful, supportive, dedicated place to work. Henry was suspended today for saying "faggot" in my class. Where else does a kid catch such swift retribution for that ugly but commonplace act?
Then I started reading "The Differentiated Classroom" by Carol Ann Tomlinson today on the subway. I was being all responsible and doing my reading for class BEFORE the response paper was due, eschewing the New York Times Book Review (my standard Monday morning fare) for insight into how to teach diverse learners.
"In Mrs. Wilkerson's 8th grade English class," Tomlinson writes, "students often read novels around a common theme, such as courage or conflict resolution...Mrs. Wilkerson also varies journal prompts, sometimes assigning different prompts to different students. Often, she encourages students to select a prompt that interests them."
Sigh.
"In Mr. O'Reilly's 8th grade English class," Tomlinson writes, shaming Mrs. Wilkerson's counterpoint, the Bad Differentiated Instructor, "students read the same novels and have whole-class discussions on them. Students complete journal entries on their readings."
Sigh.
That's EXACTLY how I do it. And how everyone in our department does it.
Us: (Deep breath) We're reading "Ethan Frome."
Them: Noooooo!
Us: Yes.
Them: This is wack! I hate this book! I don't get it! This is borin'! I hate ELA!
Us: Read it anyway, young punks, or you'll fail the quiz/marking period/semester/Regents/high school/life. See you in tutoring. I'm calling your mother.
I suck.
I could tick off the dozen or so reasons WHY I suck without blaming myself, chief among them the utter lack of coordination or planning in our department, confirmed, for example, by the list of novels we were handed to teach that was cobbled together by our new chair the week before school started, with no input from us, or that faculty at SHS tend to favor Ferris Bueller-style lectures at the front of the room, followed by rote note-copying and multiple-choice exams. When I try anything more "student-centered," that seems to empower the kids and ask for their input, I'm suspiciously regarded as "lowering the standard." Like, What, you don't think our kids can handle the real stuff? (The "real stuff" being the longstanding pillars of old school-style education.) Recently I suggested coming up with an independent writing project with a student who'd been removed from my room for discipline reasons because he hadn't done a single assignment all semester. "No, he's fully capable of doing the regular work, like everyone else," snapped the department chair. I know he's capable, but he probably thinks it's boring and irrelevant. And I sort of agree.
Anyway, back to sucking. I am in a pedagogical rut without the breathing room or the time to design something better. Forget planning it with my colleagues; I'd be developing it on my own, and there's no way. For all the mediocre curriculum I plan, it takes an awful lot of maintenance. And I'm, like, dedicated or whatever: I tutor five or eight hours a week, have everyone's parents' numbers on speed dial, manage 35 kids for 80 minute-stretches like a champ, enliven our by-the-book lessons with theatrical panache, make connections with students...my old kids from last year (the year I REALLY didn't know what I was doing) wander in and tell me how much they miss my class, God bless them.
But I know it, I KNOW I suck, I can see it in their faces when we do ANOTHER quiz just to prove they read the book they hate that we're all reading that I didn't choose. I need a vision, man. 'Cause I could be awesome. But for now, I'm not. For real.
Then I started reading "The Differentiated Classroom" by Carol Ann Tomlinson today on the subway. I was being all responsible and doing my reading for class BEFORE the response paper was due, eschewing the New York Times Book Review (my standard Monday morning fare) for insight into how to teach diverse learners.
"In Mrs. Wilkerson's 8th grade English class," Tomlinson writes, "students often read novels around a common theme, such as courage or conflict resolution...Mrs. Wilkerson also varies journal prompts, sometimes assigning different prompts to different students. Often, she encourages students to select a prompt that interests them."
Sigh.
"In Mr. O'Reilly's 8th grade English class," Tomlinson writes, shaming Mrs. Wilkerson's counterpoint, the Bad Differentiated Instructor, "students read the same novels and have whole-class discussions on them. Students complete journal entries on their readings."
Sigh.
That's EXACTLY how I do it. And how everyone in our department does it.
Us: (Deep breath) We're reading "Ethan Frome."
Them: Noooooo!
Us: Yes.
Them: This is wack! I hate this book! I don't get it! This is borin'! I hate ELA!
Us: Read it anyway, young punks, or you'll fail the quiz/marking period/semester/Regents/high school/life. See you in tutoring. I'm calling your mother.
I suck.
I could tick off the dozen or so reasons WHY I suck without blaming myself, chief among them the utter lack of coordination or planning in our department, confirmed, for example, by the list of novels we were handed to teach that was cobbled together by our new chair the week before school started, with no input from us, or that faculty at SHS tend to favor Ferris Bueller-style lectures at the front of the room, followed by rote note-copying and multiple-choice exams. When I try anything more "student-centered," that seems to empower the kids and ask for their input, I'm suspiciously regarded as "lowering the standard." Like, What, you don't think our kids can handle the real stuff? (The "real stuff" being the longstanding pillars of old school-style education.) Recently I suggested coming up with an independent writing project with a student who'd been removed from my room for discipline reasons because he hadn't done a single assignment all semester. "No, he's fully capable of doing the regular work, like everyone else," snapped the department chair. I know he's capable, but he probably thinks it's boring and irrelevant. And I sort of agree.
Anyway, back to sucking. I am in a pedagogical rut without the breathing room or the time to design something better. Forget planning it with my colleagues; I'd be developing it on my own, and there's no way. For all the mediocre curriculum I plan, it takes an awful lot of maintenance. And I'm, like, dedicated or whatever: I tutor five or eight hours a week, have everyone's parents' numbers on speed dial, manage 35 kids for 80 minute-stretches like a champ, enliven our by-the-book lessons with theatrical panache, make connections with students...my old kids from last year (the year I REALLY didn't know what I was doing) wander in and tell me how much they miss my class, God bless them.
But I know it, I KNOW I suck, I can see it in their faces when we do ANOTHER quiz just to prove they read the book they hate that we're all reading that I didn't choose. I need a vision, man. 'Cause I could be awesome. But for now, I'm not. For real.
